Hey All,
So my partner has a daughter aged 7 and when he left the FMH he rented locally to be nearby whilst she was a little toddler.
Now he is in an established relationship with me - we started living together in my rental about 30 mins away from his former FMH.
When I sold my former FMH - I chose to move further away... and my partner lost his rental as owner wanted to sell it.
Faced with going back to live with his parents a 4 hour drive away... or moving in with me in my house purchase a 2.5 hour drive from daughter and being unable to afford a new rental on his own.. he chose to move in with me as living costs are same if not bit cheaper than his previous rental.
Now.
For last 12 months he has taken sole responsibility for travel costs to pick up his daughter (£300 a month) and the 270 mile round trip which takes a min of 6 hours
What valid reasons can we state on our C100 that we want the courts to insist Ex meets him halfway or at least one hour drive towards us to save him a bit of time.
• he does own his own car. but its not reliable for a 6 hour car journey so he uses mine.
• in order to pick up daughter on time he has to cut short his working day on a Friday to accommodate the 6 hour round trip (and ensure daughter isn't falling in to bed at midnight!)
• clearly having a tired dad doesnt benefit daughter but we don't want ti imply he isn't safe to drive... but arguably even lorry drivers cannot drive for more than 8 hours and on rare occasions it has taken him nearly that due to diversions or roadworks
Ex refuses to even drive 5 miles down the road.. so our argument has to be compelling enough to convince a judge to sway in our favour.
He is prepared to negotiate... so maybe he does 3 trips and she does 1.
Or meet half way on alternate trips.
Any thoughts?
Yes I know it was him that chose to leave the area - but his choices were limited and he would obviously prefer to be living near his daughter but he can't afford rent or purchase on his own
So my partner has a daughter aged 7 and when he left the FMH he rented locally to be nearby whilst she was a little toddler.
Now he is in an established relationship with me - we started living together in my rental about 30 mins away from his former FMH.
When I sold my former FMH - I chose to move further away... and my partner lost his rental as owner wanted to sell it.
Faced with going back to live with his parents a 4 hour drive away... or moving in with me in my house purchase a 2.5 hour drive from daughter and being unable to afford a new rental on his own.. he chose to move in with me as living costs are same if not bit cheaper than his previous rental.
Now.
For last 12 months he has taken sole responsibility for travel costs to pick up his daughter (£300 a month) and the 270 mile round trip which takes a min of 6 hours
What valid reasons can we state on our C100 that we want the courts to insist Ex meets him halfway or at least one hour drive towards us to save him a bit of time.
• he does own his own car. but its not reliable for a 6 hour car journey so he uses mine.
• in order to pick up daughter on time he has to cut short his working day on a Friday to accommodate the 6 hour round trip (and ensure daughter isn't falling in to bed at midnight!)
• clearly having a tired dad doesnt benefit daughter but we don't want ti imply he isn't safe to drive... but arguably even lorry drivers cannot drive for more than 8 hours and on rare occasions it has taken him nearly that due to diversions or roadworks
Ex refuses to even drive 5 miles down the road.. so our argument has to be compelling enough to convince a judge to sway in our favour.
He is prepared to negotiate... so maybe he does 3 trips and she does 1.
Or meet half way on alternate trips.
Any thoughts?
Yes I know it was him that chose to leave the area - but his choices were limited and he would obviously prefer to be living near his daughter but he can't afford rent or purchase on his own